Main Content

The World of Protozoa, Rotifera, Nematoda and Oligochaeta

Pseudopedinella

[ref. ID; 7737]
Notes; The taxonomy of Pseudopedinella seems presently very uncertain and preliminary. An indication of the difficulties encountered when trying to identify members of the genus to species level is illustrated by the most recently list of strains from the Culture Centre of Algae ad Protozoa in Cambridge (Anonymous, 1982). This includes 13 isolates of Pseudopedinella, none of which identified to species. Up to date, eight species have been described in the literature, viz. P. pyriforme Carter (1937), P. elastica and P. erkensis Skuja (1948), P. disciformis and P. rhizopodiaca Schiller (1952), P. gallica and P. ambigua Bourrelly (1957), and P. variabilis Rouchijajnen (1968). Whether these should all be recognized is pending further studies, preferably based on cultures and on whether any new and reliable species characterister can be found. All previous descriptions seem to be based on material that was more or less affected by handling. Thus, both of Schiller's species, P. disciformis and P. rhizopodiaca seem to be developmental stages of P. elastica. Similar morphological development has been obtained in our cultures, and the cell sizes largely overlap. Probably, P. disciformis represents slow-growing cells adapted to low temperature and light intensity, and P. rhizopodiaca fast-growing cells adapted to higher temperature and strong light. Pseudopedinella gallica may be identical to P. erkensis on account of the shape and size of the cells, the small chloroplasts, the poorly developed trailing stalk, and the contractile vacuole (1-2 in P. erkensis, 2 in P. gallica). P. ambigua seems to belong to the genus Pedinella on account of its distinct anterior tentacles. It is very similar in shape and size to Pedinella hexacostata as described by Swale (1969). Whether Pseudopedinella elastica can be kept separate from P. pyriformis and P. variabilis is another problem which cannot yet be definitely solved. The original description of P. pyriforme (Carter 1937) is based on material which seems to be comparable to a senescent culture. However, the difference in size is too great to be easily disregarded: Carter, 1937, P. pyriforme: length of body 5-8 um, breadth at anterior end 4-9 um, at posterior end 3-6.5 um vs. Skuja, 1948, P. elastica: cell length 14-17 um, width 13-17 um. If we accept these measurements as correct, to own are almost intermediate, viz. length 9-15 um, width 10-14 um. Ostroff & Van Valkenburg (1978) give 8-10x9-12 um for material which does not seem to differ much if at all from ours, but which they determined as P. pyriforme. Hulburt's (1965) P. pyriforme measured 7-8 um in length and 7-9 um in width, thus conforming closely to the original description. He recorded "one trailing appendage, inserted in a posterior cavity, possessing one or more inflations, occasionally branching, very variable in length; sometimes several small, peripherally placed trailing appendages". Ostroff & Van Valkenburg observed similar structures: "Frequently one, or more, long rhizopodia are surrounded at the proximal end by a "halo" of 4-6 much shorter ones". In both cases, these small appendages appear to be what we interpret as posterior tentacles. The posterior tentacles of P. elastica much resemble the anterior ones of Pedinella tricostata Rouchijajnen and a small undescribed Pedinella species, both isolated from the Tvarmninne area (S. & G. Hallfors, unpubl.). Pseudopedinella variabilis (Rouchijajnen 1968) does not appear to differ in morphology from Pseudopedinella pyriformis. There is the possibility that the Pseudopedinella elastica-variabilis-pyriforme group is a complex of microspecies, each with (to our present knowledge) a more or less restricted geographical range. However, a more plausible and much more atractive hypothesis is that we are dealing with one variable species whose cell size is inversely related to the salinity of the medium. Unfortunately the salinity data given by Schiller (1952) and Hulburt (1965) are too vague for their finds to be included in the comparison, but they are not contradictory to the general trends. Schiller's material originated from inland brackish water, apparently of rather low salinity ("leicht salzige Geschmack") with an ion composition different from that of diluted seawater (cf. Huber-Pestralozzi 1956).
  1. Pseudopedinella ambigua Bourrelly, 1957 (ref. ID; 7737)
  2. Pseudopedinella disciformis Schiller, 1952 (ref. ID; 7737)
  3. Pseudopedinella elastica Skuja, 1948 (ref. ID; 7737)
  4. Pseudopedinella erkensis Skuja, 1948 (ref. ID; 7737)
  5. Pseudopedinella gallica Bourrelly, 1957 (ref. ID; 7737)
  6. Pseudopedinella pyriforme Carter, 1937 (ref. ID; 7737)
  7. Pseudopedinella rhizopodiaca Schiller, 1952 (ref. ID; 7737)
  8. Pseudopedinella variabilis Rouchijajnen, 1968 (ref. ID; 7737)

Pseudopedinella elastica Skuja, 1948 (ref. ID; 7737)

Descriptions