Ref ID : 4403
Joong Ki Choi, D. Wayne Coats, David C. Brownlee, and Eugene B. Small; Morphology and infraciliature of Three Species of Eutintinnus (Ciliophora; Tintinnina) with Guidelines of Interpreting Protargol-Stained Tintinnine Ciliates. J.Protozool. 39(1):80-92, 1992
Reprint
In File
Notes
The infraciliatures of three Chesapeake Bay species of Eutintinnus conforming in lorica morphology to E. angustatus, E. pectinis, and E. tenuis were compared following Protargol silver impregnation. The kinetome of these species had a number of shared attributes including: 1) a right and left field that were of similar length and kinetal spacing; 2) two, rarely three, long dorsal kineties composed of monokinetids; 3) a ventral kinety; and 4) the absence of a true posterior kinety. Nonetheless, the specific organization of infraciliary components varied considerably among species. For example, the organization of the ventral kinety and several kineties along the border of the left field was different in all three species. In addition, the dorsal kineties of E. angustatus differed positionally from those of E. pectinis and E. tenuis. Some divergence in oral infraciliature was also noted, with the arrangement of infundibular oral polikinetids in E. pectinis and E. tenuis being distinct from that of E. angustatus. The amount of variation in the infraciliature of Eutintinnus spp. was much greater than previously noted for congeneric species of tintinnines and supports the separation E. angustatus, E. pectinis, and E. tenuis at the generic or subgeneric level.