Ref ID : 2884
Wilhelm Foissner and Sabine Agatha; Morphology and Morphogenesis of Metopus hasei Sondheim, 1929 and M. inversus (Jankowski, 1964) nov. comb. (Ciliophora, Metopida). J.Eukaryot.Microbiol. 46(2):174-193, 1999
Reprint
In File
Notes
The morphology and morphogenesis of Metopus hasei Sondheim, 1929 and M. inversus (Jankowski, 1964) n. comb. were investigated using live observation, silver impregnation, and scanning electron microscopy. Metopus has a spiral body organization and the ventral margin of the preoral dome bears five specialized ciliary rows, that form the so-called perizonal stripe. Division is homothetogenic, occurs in freely motile (i.e. non-encysted) condition, and includes a partial reorganization of the parental oral apparatus. During division, the complicated cell shape becomes ellipsoidal and all ciliary rows arrange meridionally. Stomatogenesis is entirely somatic (= pluerotelokinetal) and commences with the formation of kinetofragments in some dorsolateral kineties. The fragments become the opisthe's adoral membranelles, while the paroral membrane is generated by the left two perizonal ciliary rows, which proliferate kinetids Intrakinetally. The perizonal stripe of the opisthe is generated by the three right parental perizonal kineties, which divide, and by two dorsolateral ciliary rows, which are added. The morphogenetic processes, especially the unique mode of formation of the paroral membrane, are used to define the order Metopida Jankowski, 1980 n. stat. more properly. The ontogenetic, ultrastructural, and sequence data available give no clear indication about metopid phylogeny, but definitely exclude metopids from the classical heterotrichs, with which they were classified for more than 100 years. Accordingly, we place the Metopida as incertae sedis in the subphylum Intramacronucleata Lynn, 1996.