Main Content

The World of Protozoa, Rotifera, Nematoda and Oligochaeta

Protacanthamoeba

Protacanthamoeba Page, 1981 (ref. ID; 3991 original paper, 7710)

Order Acanthopodida Page, 1976 (ref. ID; 6789)

[ref. ID; 3991]
Slender, flexible, sometimes furcate subpseudopodia, produced from a broad, hyaline lobopodium; centrospheres including plaque-shaped centriole-like body; cyst without preformed pores or opercula. (ref. ID; 3991)
Comments; Protacanthamoeba n. g. is undoubtedly a member of the family Acanthamoebidae (Sawyer & Griffin 1975) by virtue of the light- and electron-microscopical characters of its trophozoites. The distinction between Acanthamoebidae and Echinamoebidae on the basis of presence or absence of performed pores and opercula in the cyst (Page 1976) cannot be maintained. The families Acanthamoebidae and Echinamoebidae were proposed almost simultaneously (Page 1975; Sawyer & Griffin 1975) without the authors of each being aware of the other new family before publication. The argument of Pernin & Pussard (1979) that a better distinction is necessary is accepted, but no better distinction was available at the time when the two families were established. However, it is obvious that some members of the Echinamoebidae as originally defined are very different from Acanthamoebidae, and a re-definition of the families must be postponed until the genera now classified as Echinamoebidae can be investigated with the electron microscope. Furthermore, the differences between the active stage of Comandonia on the one hand and Acanthamoeba and Protacanthamoeba on the other raise a question about the familial affinities of Comandonia. (ref. ID; 3991)
Type species; Protacanthamoeba caledonica (ref. ID; 3991)
  1. Protacanthamoeba caledonica Page, 1981 (ref. ID; 3991 original paper)
  2. Protacanthamoeba invadens (Singh & Hanumaiah, 1979) n. comb. (ref. ID; 3991)

Protacanthamoeba caledonica Page, 1981 (ref. ID; 3991 original paper)

Diagnosis

Amoebae in locomotion mostly 20-40 um, with length greater than or occasionally equal to width; sometimes with long drawn-out (spatulate) posterior end; subpseudopodia up to 8 um long, commonly about 3.5 um; mean diameter of rounded cells approximately 19 um; mean nuclear diameter approximately 8 um. Cysts usually smooth-walled to light microscope; cyst wall three-layered, with fine structure of outer wall fibrillar, middle layer dense, inner layer finely granular; layers usually in close contact, but tangential splitting often giving rise to pseudo-exocyst; thickness of cyst approximately 0.6 times greatest diameter. Original strain does not grown at 37 degrees C. (ref. ID; 3991)

Descriptions

Comments

This strain appears to belong to the same species as organisms designated Hartmannella glebae by Singh (1952), since when other authors (e.g., Sawyer & Griffin 1975) have used the specific epithet in the same sense, that is, Acanthamoeba-like organism with a cyst lacking any preformed route of exit. However, comparison of Dobell's (1914) description of his Amoeba glebae with the descriptions by Singh (1952) and Singh & Das (1970) raises strong doubts about the use of Dobell's specific epithet by the latter authors. One reasons for doubt is Dobell's description of a "banded appearance when seen in optical section" of the outer later of the cyst wall. There are also size differences. Although Dobell gave the species of "rounded" amoebae as 12-20 um, he said that the average size of "spherical organisms' during nuclear division was 16-17 um. Singh & Das (1970) reported the diameter of the rounded form as 15-30 um. The cyst diameters are less easily reconcilable. Dobell gave this as 10 um to a little more than 13 um. Singh & Das did not reported cyst diameter, but their illustrations yield figures of 15-19.4 um. Cyst diameters of the Scottish strain in the present study were 11-21 um, with a mean of 16.5 um for 300 cysts. To attribute the size difference between Dobell's findings and their own to "unsuitable cultural conditions" in Dobell's study, as Singh & Das (1970) did, is unwarranted and unhelpful. The variation might to due to differences in food supply or age of culture but could also be due to either intraspecific variations or misidentification by the latter authors. Differences between the accounts of Dobell and the later workers included details of the mitotic figure, though differences in the shape of that figure do not appear reliable enough for taxonomic use. It seems unlikely, therefore, and certainly at least questionable, that the organism studied by later workers belong to Dobell's species. It is possible that the Scottish isolate described in the present study belong to the same species as the organism investigated under the names Hartmannella glebae and Acanthamoeba glebae by Singh and co-workers. Dobell's name cannot be used for any of these. The most similar genus is Acanthamoeba Volkonsky, 1931, as amended by Page (1967), in which the organism that Singh called Hartmannella glebae has been included by recent authors (Sawyer & Griffin 1975; Singh & Hanumaiah 1979). The trophic amoeba of P. caledonica is indistinguishable from that of Acanthamoeba with the light microscope. This similarity extends to the electron-microscopical level, most strikingly in the possession of a centriole-like body, which with the associated Golgi apparatus constitutes the centrosphere of Pussard & Pons (1978). The cysts wall differs, of course, in its lack of performed pores closed by opercula. It can be seen that the exocyst or outer layer of the Acanthamoeba cyst wall consists of fibrillar material oriented parallel to the cell surface, facilitating splitting. The endocyst is complex: an outer layer of sparse, finely fibrous material not always oriented in the same direction; a denser middle layer which at the ostioles (bordering on the opercula) appears continuous with the exocyst; and an inner region which appears finely granules, but on closer examination can be seen at least in places to consist of the fine fibrils tangential to the cell surface. It appears that the outermost layer of the endocyst is simply material that has been torn and somewhat disoriented by separation of exocyst and endocyst during continued dehydration of the cell after hardening other exocyst. The cyst wall of A. polyphaga therefore consists of only two morphologically distinguishable materials: that making up the exocyst and the sparse (therefore lightly stained) two outer layers of the endocyst, and that making up the more finely fibrillar, though granular-appearing, inner layer of the endocyst. In contrast, there appear to be three morphological distinct regions in the cyst wall of Protacanthamoeba. Cysts of other species of Acanthamoeba have been described from electron-microscopical observations. The negative zinc chloroiodide test on the cysts of P. caledonica is not advanced as conclusive evidence that cellulose is lacking. The question can be settled only by analysis. The observation and explanation of pseudo-exocyst formation in P. caledonica emphasize the need for caution in interpreting light-microscopical observations of cysts which appears sometimes to have a single wall, sometimes two wall layers. Unpublished electron-micrographs of Hartmannella vermiformis Page, 1967, show a wall consisting entirely of a single material, which may split off near its external surface giving rise to the irregular pseudo-exocyst seen in some but not all cells (Page 1967), a description which Singh & Hanumaiah (1979) found "most confusing and inconsistent." Pernin & Pussard (1979) have described Comandonia operculata, which has a cyst with opercula to which the exocyst does not contribute a part as it does in Acanthamoeba. Furthermore, the trophic amoeba differs from both Acanthamoeba and Protacanthamoeba in several ways; type of subpseudopodia, presence of 10 or more contractile vacuoles, lack of classical dictyosome structure of Golgi apparatus, and lack of centriole-like body. (ref. ID; 3991)

Habitat

Isolated from estuary but probably present there only as cysts; probably occurring in fresh water and soil. (ref. ID; 3991)

Type materials

Type slides deposited in British Museum (Natural History). Holotype 1980:12:22:1. Paratype 1980:12:22:2. (ref. ID; 3991)