ユーザー別ナビ |
  • 一般の方
  • 研究関係者の方
  • 環境問題に関心のある方
2018年9月20日

A review of quality of life (QOL) assessments and indicators: Towards a ‘‘QOL-Climate’’ assessment framework

Ronald C. Estoque, Takuya Togawa, Makoto Ooba, Kei Gomi, Shogo Nakamura, Yasuaki Hijioka, and Yasuko Kameyama

論文情報

A review of quality of life (QOL) assessments and indicators: Towards a ‘‘QOL-Climate’’ assessment framework

著者:Ronald C. Estoque, Takuya Togawa, Makoto Ooba, Kei Gomi, Shogo Nakamura, Yasuaki Hijioka, and Yasuko Kameyama

発表年:2018
掲載雑誌:AMBIO, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-018-1090-3

論文へのリンク(英文のみ)

キーワード

Climate change; QOL; Quality of life; Social indicators; Vulnerability; Well-being

概要

Quality of life (QOL), although a complex and amorphous concept, is a term that warrants attention, especially in discussions on issues that touch on the impacts of climate change and variability. Based on the principles of RepOrting standards for Systematic Evidence Synthesis, we present a systematic review aimed at gaining insights into the conceptualization and methodological construct of previous studies regarding QOL and QOL-related indexes. We find that (i) QOL assessments vary in terms of conceptual foundations, dimensions, indicators, and units of analysis, (ii) social indicators are consistently used across assessments, (iii) most assessments consider indicators that pertain to the livability of the environment, and (iv) QOL can be based on objective indicators and/or subjective wellbeing, and on a composite index or unaggregated dimensions and indicators. However, we also find that QOL assessments remain poorly connected with climate-related issues, an important research gap. Our proposed ‘‘QOL-Climate’’ assessment framework, designed to capture the social-ecological impacts of climate change and variability, can potentially help fill this gap.

fig7. the qol-climate assessment framework
Fig. 7. The ‘‘QOL-Climate’’ assessment framework: a general framework for assessing quality of life, considering the social-ecological impacts of climate change and variability. Key references used in the development of this framework include IPCC’s AR5 on climate-related issues, Ostrom (2009) on the social-ecological system paradigm, Costanza et al. (2007) on the integrative definition of QOL, Elkington (1994, 1997) on the triple bottom line, www.forumforthefuture.org on the five capitals, and www.pik-potsdam.de on impact chain analysis. Also included are references reviewed for some examples of indicators, and the syntheses in this review for the overall structure of the diagram

主な論文の解説一覧に戻る